![]() |
![]() |
||
|
|
4th Quarterly Competition Results - 27th April 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
David Butler was our judge for this final competition of the session. In his introduction President Richard Scaife noted that David was well known to us having previously judged an inter-club competition at our Annual Exhibition. David set the right tone by immediately asking if he should continue or whether we should all retire to the local Pub. Strangely, when we shouted back “The Pub” he misheard and continued his judging duties. David being well known internationally, we were agog to know how he would react to our club-level images. In the main he responded well and gave thoughtful advice to our members. Dorothy had been commended (by a previous judge) for an excellent toilet paper advert. This time she was advised to go into wall-paper design which leaves her perplexed as to which route to follow. Bill noted with interest that his deer in Poole harbour needed more back-ground information to prove to the judge that it really was Poole harbour. So Bill was equally perplexed when his second Print showing a wall, a tree, and a lane, apparently needed a tighter crop (remove the lane??). Bill has previously noted with many other judges that tightly cropped pictures tend to be criticised for not showing their context, whereas when authors attempt to show this setting they are criticised for not concentrating on the subject. There seems to be a genuine dilemma here: Having been shown the context (ie immediate surroundings) the judge can concentrate on the main subject, and often wishes to lose the context (which is now in his minds eye). But not knowing the context (as the author inevitably did) the judge feels deprived and unsure and asks for a bit more to satisfy his curiosity. The problem is that in satisfying this curiosity in the judge the author inevitably lays him/her self open to the criticism “needs tighter cropping” David dealt briskly with the 100 images (Prints and Slides) and finished by 10pm. True to his promise he then retired to the Grapes with the “Grapes committee”. Bill Chadband
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||